Translate

Thursday, December 18, 2008

I finally agree with a liberal

Ultra-liberal syndicated columnist Nat Hentoff and I have something we can both agree with -- Caroline Kennedy should not be appointed U.S. Senator from New York after Hillary Clinton gives up her seat to take over the State Department.

There are millions of New York residents who are more qualified to hold a Senate seat. Gov. David Paterson should resist the pressure of party insiders and the Kennedy clan and appoint the most qualified person for the seat.

From a recent Hentoff column:
There is no question that 51-year-old Caroline Kennedy is genuinely civic-minded and, like any American, is entitled to expand what she feels is her mission in life. But hardly any unrenowned American with such limited qualifications as hers for the Senate would have a chance at a seat in that body, which, however fractured by partisanship, has considerable power to affect our lives.

And these years, despite the illusory McCain-Feingold campaign finance "reform" law, few Americans would have the financial resources to even contemplate running for the Senate in New York.

If Paterson does appoint Caroline Kennedy, her campaigns in 2010 and then for a full term in 2012 would cost $80 million by current fund-raising standards.

But that's not a problem. In the Dec. 9 New York Times, David Halbfinger reports that Ted Kennedy's "message, according to Democratic aides who were not authorized to discuss the conversations, is that Ms. Kennedy — backed by her family's extensive fund-raising network — would have the wherewithal to run back-to-back costly state-wide races."

Significantly, the report adds that the ability (of a Senate candidate to keep the seat for Democrats) "is a key concern for Governor Paterson, who has been deluged from every direction by politicians interested in the seat, which the governor is expected to fill early next year."

If that candidate is indeed Caroline Kennedy, her Republican opponent in one of the pivotal debates might gently say to her on television, "If your name were just Caroline Schlossberg, you wouldn't be here."

We have many entitlements in this country, but a family-name entitlement to a Senate seat is not one of them.
Read the full column at The Mercury's Web site.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Where is Caroline listed in Clown Flager's book of entitlements? Beware of self professed men of God who dye their hair or wear wigs or both

Anonymous said...

The deal is made. Bet the house. Uncle Sot backed Obama and he is lining up a family candidate for 2016. The Bush family did it. The Biden family is doing it. "Don't forget we are royality too" Nepotism is alive and well in our democracy on both sides of the aisle.

Anonymous said...

-> "I finally agree with a liberal."

Oh, Tony, woe is us!

Sadly, I fear Anonymous is correct. The woman is likely to be appointed, and the Kennedy name is all the credentials she'll need.

It was interesting to see her on the news this week, parading through my old Central New York stomping grounds to meet the folks in what Noo Yawkers call "the countryside." More sense in some of those heifer barns than on the city's streets.